The Six Thinking Hats

In this tutorial, we will learn about the six thinking hats that can help you look at problems from different perspectives, but at a time, avoid confusion from too many angles, crowding your thinking.

The six Thinking Hats was created by “Edward de Bono,” and published in his 1985 book of the same name. In forces, you to move outside your habitual thinking style, and to look at things from several different perspectives.

Such a premise of the method is that the human brain thinks in several distinct ways that can be deliberately challenged and plan for use in a structured way, allowing one to develop tactics for thinking about particular issues. “De Bono,” identifies six distinct directions in which the brain can be a challenge.

In each of these directions, the mind will identify and bring into consciousness certain aspects of issues that are considered (e.g., gut instinct, pessimistic judgment, neutral facts). None of these directions is an entirely natural way of thinking, but rather how some of us already represent the results of our thinking.

A compelling presented is sensitivity to “mismatch” stimuli. That is given as a valuable survival instinct, because, in the natural world: the thing that is out of the ordinary may well be dangerous. 

The colored hats are used as metaphors for each direction. Switching to a path is symbolized by putting on a colored hat, either literally or metaphorically. This metaphor of using an imaginary hat or cap as a symbol for a different thinking direction was first mentioned by “De Bono,” as early as 1971 in his book “Lateral Thinking for Management” when describing a brainstorming framework.

These metaphors allow for more complete and elaborate segregation of the thinking directions. The six thinking hats indicate problems and solutions about an idea the thinker may come up with.

Plan choices can produce much discourse amid the assessment procedure. That should be controlled on the off chance that we are to make high utilization of our time. It is anything but difficult to favor one side, to shield our thoughts, and to assault what we may see as restricting beliefs, which may not be valuable.

That maintains a strategic distance from showdown and channels our essential investigation is the ‘Six Thinking Hats’ approach (Dr. Edward de Bono). A gathering can assess a thought and can contend both the advantages and disadvantages while staying as goal as would be prudent.

An executive ought to formally encourage the procedure. An individual may wear a cap to create a remark with no conceivable connected shame wearing the dark hat for a minute. I don’t believe that this will work—the continuously essential individual without being valuable needs to wind up distinctly helpful when asked by the seat. Now, let us wear a yellow cap and see what great things may come about because of this thought.

The hats


White hat 

  1. Impartial – (consider white paper)

Data – What do we know? What data do we need? What do we require?


Red hat 

  1. Fire, warmth sentiments, feeling, instinct, hunches.

 Black hat 

  1. Alert Legitimately, judgment, profound quality.

Yellow hat –

  1. Daylight positive, idealism, benefits.

Green hat –

  1. Development of new thoughts, new inclinations, choices openings.

Blue hat –

  1. Sky diagram, control of the procedure, motivation, next stride, activity arranges, conclusions.

Difference between Critical and Creative Thinking:

Critical Thinking Creative Thinking
Analytic Generative
Vertical Lateral
judgmentSuspended Judgment
Focused Diffused







What Is Critical Thinking

In this tutorial, we will learn about critical thinking and the ability to think clearly and rationally about what to do or what to believe.

Someone with critical thinking skills can do the following:

Understand the logical connections between ideas.

Identify construct and evaluate arguments.

Nobody dependably acts equitably and soundly. We plot for egotistical interests, babble, brag, misrepresent, and hedge. It is just human to wish to approve our earlier learning, to vindicate our previous choices, or to maintain our prior convictions.

During the time spent fulfilling our self-image, in any case, we can frequently deny ourselves scholarly development and opportunity.

We may not generally need to apply fundamental deduction aptitudes; instead, we ought to have those abilities accessible to be utilized when required.

Someone with critical thinking skills can do the following: understand the logical connections between ideas, identify, construct, and evaluate arguments.

Critical thinking incorporates an intricate blend of abilities. Among the fundamental qualities is the accompanying:


We fundamentally think when we rely on reason as opposed to feeling. We must confirm, disregard no known confirmation, and take after proof where it leads, and are concerned more with finding the best clarification than correct breaking down apparent disarray and making inquiries.


We think when we weigh the impacts of intentions and predisposition and recognize our suppositions, preferences, inclinations, or perspective.


We think when we perceive enthusiastic motivations, egotistical thought processes, loathsome purposes, or different methods of self-trickiness.


We think when we evaluate every single sensible surmising consider an assortment of conceivable perspectives or points of view, remain open to option elucidations accept another clarification, model, or worldview because it clarifies the proof better, is less complicated, or has fewer irregularities or covers more information take new needs in light of a reconsideration of the evidence or reassessment of our genuine advantages, and do not dismiss disliked perspectives crazy.


We think when we are exact, fastidious, complete, and comprehensive, resist control and silly interests, and avoid snap judgments.


We fundamentally think that when we recognize the importance or potential value of option presumptions and points of view, know the degree and weight of proof in total, critical masterminds are naturally distrustful.

They approach writings with the same distrust and doubt from the approach talked comments. Dangerous masterminds are dynamic, not latent. They make inquiries and dissect.

They intentionally apply strategies and procedures to reveal meaning or guarantee their comprehension. The critical genius doesn’t take a self-absorbed perspective of the world.

They are interested in new thoughts and points of view. They will challenge their convictions and explore contending proof.

Basic intuition empowers us to perceive a wide variety of subjective examinations of generally target information and to assess how well every investigation may address our issues.

Realities might be actualities, yet how we translate them may fluctuate. By difference, uninvolved, non-basic scholars take an oversimplified perspective of the world.

  • They see things in highly contrasting, as either-or, as opposed to perceiving an assortment of conceivable comprehension.
  • They consider inquiries to be yes or no without any nuances.
  • They neglect to see linkages and complexities.
  • They neglect to perceive related components.

Non-basic scholars take a prideful perspective of the world:

  • They take their certainties as the main important ones.
  • They take their particular viewpoint as the main sensible one.
  • They take their objective as the main legitimate one.
  • Critical Thinking Skills.
  • Scheffer and Rubenfeld examine basic speculation propensities and essential deduction aptitudes. For each of the basic intuition aptitudes demonstrated as follows, they give various movement proclamations.

Analyzing Applying standards

Discriminating information seeking

Logical reasoning Predicting

Transforming knowledge

Barriers to problem-solving:

This article takes a gander at a scope of components known as ‘pieces’ which can impede critical thinking. These barriers prevent people from solving problems in the most efficient manner possible.

Five of the most common processes and factors that researchers have identified as barriers to problem-solving are confirmation bias, mental set, functional fixedness, unnecessary constraints, and irrelevant information.

Creative Thinking

In this tutorial, we will learn about creative thinking is innovative, dissimilar, parallel, and the group to be imaginative does not, for the most part, the yield comes about.

The more significant part of us is not regular innovative masterminds. Letting oneself know and the group to be imaginative does not, for the most part, the yield comes about.

Some exceptional procedures are required to help us utilize our brains in an unexpected way to change our typical speculation handle.

The issue with inventive deduction is that nearly by definition, any thought that has not been analyzed will sound insane. In any case, a great arrangement will presumably stable crazy at first shockingly; that is the reason we regularly won’t put it forward.

Creative thinking:

  1. Is innovative
  2. Is dissimilar
  3. Is parallel

Produces numerous conceivable arrangements

Lack of creative thinking:

Lack of creative thinking is clear goals and objectives written down, accompanied by detailed, written plans of action when you become clear about what you want and how you are going to achieve it, your creative mind springs to life.

The brain: 

Keeping in mind the end goal to discover methods for being deliberately innovative, we should first see how the cerebrum functions.

Experimentation on the cerebrum has ended up being exceptionally troublesome, and it is just in the most recent couple of years, with cutting edge filtering innovation, that science has found quite a bit of what we now know.

Put permanently, and the cerebrum comprises of two halves of the globe joined by an extension of neural tissue called the Corpus Callous.

In irregular cases, a few people have conceived with a part corpus callous where the two parts of the cerebrum are not associated.

Part mind patients are fantastic subjects for contemplating how capacities are restricted and what part of the cerebrum they performed.

It has demonstrated that the inverse portion of the mind controls anatomical elements in one piece of the body; the cerebrum is cross.

In one test, a split cerebrum subject is to demonstrate the words ‘Cap Band’. Every eye sees the entire visual field.

The left half of the cerebrum handles the privileged visual field, and the right side of the mind prepares the left visual field.

At the point when the subject asked what has perused, they answer the band. When soliciting what sort from a group, the matter must figure Rubber-band, a Jazz band? The item has no clue what kind of band.

The conclusion is that the left half of the mind is the word handling side, and obviously, it is this side which peruses the expression ‘Band.’

The right side has gotten the impression of the name ‘Cap,’ yet due to the cut corpus callous, this is not transmitted to one side mind.

Since the subject can’t state that they have gotten the impression of the word ‘Cap,’ we can conclude that the correct cerebrum is not fit for word handling.

These comparative analyses permit a model of the mind to be drawn, demonstrating the localization of capacities between the two parts. This model is valid for the right given individuals.

There is less specialization of the two parts when the subject is left-handed.

 Blocks to creativity:

We may fear:

  1. Committing errors
  2. Looking absurd
  3. Being reprimanded
  4. Being distant from everyone else
  5. Being untouchable
  6. Aggravating convention
  7. Being connected with taboos

We may also suffer from:

  1. Left mind predominance
  2. Incongruent destinations
  3. Antagonistic vibe

Creative thinking techniques: 

Numerous strategies exist to animate imaginative deduction, and while the accompanying rundown is not thorough, the cases underneath can function admirably when tackling business issues. No extraordinary apparatuses are required.


The process

  1. Sort out the group, materials, and copyists.
  2. Select an executive.
  3. Express the issues we are attempting to tackle.

Restate the issue of various circumstances: 

How to decrease time?

How to accelerate?

Hinder the left cerebrum.

Have a warm-up session e.g.

 Other uses for:

A gumboot.

A light.

The brainstorming is a situation where a group of people meets to generate new ideas and solutions around a specific domain of interest by removing inhibitions.

People can think more freely, and they suggest as many spontaneous new ideas as possible.

All the opinions are noted down without criticism and after the brainstorming session. Fundamentally, no examinations permitted on any thought amid the course.

The administrator’s part is to keep the ideas coming, regularly quick and enraged, with individuals striking sparkles off each other.

What Is Thinking

In this tutorial, we will learn about what is thinking is most shortsighted, a person in response to a scope of jolts, and begins a procedure that adjusts or reinforces their reality see, convictions, assessments, states of mind, and practices.

Since years, Psychology has played a vital role in the betterment of human nature and society. Here we present an article on the thinking process of a human mind.

This article talks about how we need to operate ourselves when we are in a state of hypertension. Each of us thinks in different ways for the same thing, but how we think is the matter here, i.e., do we think critically or creatively. Below is the article describes both ways of thinking, as well as the situation in which they are used, respectively.

Thinking is the last cognitive activity, consciously using our brains to make sense of the world around us, and how to respond to it. Unconscious, our minds are still ‘thinking’ neurally. It is merely about chains of synaptic connections. Thinking as experienced is of ‘thoughts’ and ‘reasoning’ as we seek to connect what we sense with our inner world of understanding and hence do and say things that will change the outer world.

Our ability to think develops neurally in early life. When we interact with others, it becomes directed, for example, when we learn values from our parents and knowledge from our teachers. We learn that it is good to think in specific ways and harmful to think in other ways. To be accepted into a social group, we are expected to think and act in ways that are harmonious with the group culture.

The barriers to the upliftment of a being are the barriers, and below we have discussed the methods of problem-solving. It would help in the up-gradation of the prior knowledge of the course, which is studied. They mentioned a lot of techniques of problem-solving activities that support the person to have ease in the solving process.

  What is Thinking? 

I trust that thinking is at its most shortsighted where a person in response to a scope of jolts, begins a procedure that adjusts or reinforces their reality see, convictions, assessments, states of mind, and practices.

Some different definitions are:

  • The procedure of utilizing your brain to consider something deliberately thinking always made him grimace; she stopped for thought.
  • Thought or deduction is a mental procedure that allows creatures to display the world, thus managing it viably as indicated by their objectives, arranges, finishes, and cravings. Ideas much the same as believed are awareness, cognizance, thought, and creative ability.
  • Thinking is an internal mental process that utilizes data as information coordinates that data into past scholarly material, and the outcome might be learning or might be nothing. Critical thinking, arranging, data reconciliation, and examination are four sorts of considering.
  • Cognition, mental activity or action, psychological review, see acknowledgment.
  • Utilizing intuition alludes to low-abundance verbal operant activity, for the most parts subvocal talking an inward reaction or chain of results.